Cannabis-based remedies lack reliable clinical evidence for veterinary use
Until further research is available, use of marijuana in dogs and cats is entirely experimental and based only on anecdote.
Medical marijuana for humans has been a hot topic for many years. Much of the debate about it has focused on ethical and legal issues that aren’t directly answerable through scientific research. Participants in these debates often gravitate toward ideological extremes. For some, any use of marijuana, medical or recreational, is immoral and dangerous. For those at the other extreme, marijuana is a perfect, risk-free cure for anything from depression to cancer.
In the last several years, these debates have migrated to veterinary medicine, with both extremes well represented. It has grown easier and more common for animal owners to provide their pets with cannabis-based remedies, both marijuana itself and products specifically produced for companion animals.
As in human medicine, much of the discussion about these remedies has focused on legal issues. There is a general consensus that it is almost never legal for vets to recommend or provide cannabis-based treatments to their patients regardless of state and local laws that permit human use of medical marijuana. The legality of unregulated and untested cannabis products sold over the counter is less clear. Insufficient attention, however, generally is given to the critical scientific question, “What are the risks and benefits of medicinal use of cannabis based products?”
Any consideration of the medical use of cannabis should be based on rational, objective evaluation of the scientific evidence concerning risks and benefits, uninfluenced by the surrounding ethical and legal debates.
A lack of research
Cannabis sativa contains a bewildering variety of chemical compounds. Some have been shown to have significant effects on many different body systems, from the CNS to the GI tract to the immune system. There is, therefore, good reason to believe cannabis-derived medicine could have real benefits, as well as real risks, in veterinary patients.
Unfortunately, no reliable clinical research evidence exists for the use of cannabis-based remedies in small animal patients. None. That means we can’t state with confidence the benefits or risks of any such remedy. We can hypothesize, based on the pharmacology of cannabis compounds or on anecdotal evidence, and we can extrapolate from studies in lab animals or humans. However, there is no direct, reliable evidence to support any claim about any veterinary medical marijuana treatment.
This lack of research is due primarily to strict laws regulating the availability of marijuana, for research purposes as well as medical or recreational use. Hopefully, as these laws change, more data will emerge. For now, the best we can do is look at what we know about the risks of marijuana in veterinary species, as well as the risks and benefits identified in humans.
It is clear that marijuana exposure can have toxic effects on dogs and cats.1-2 These range from mild to severe, though exposure is rarely fatal. There also is evidence that the greater availability of marijuana associated with legalization for human medical or recreational use can increase the incidence of marijuana toxicosis in pets in some areas.3 There is little information on the safety of cannabis-based medical products aimed at the veterinary market. A survey of owners using such products did report low rates of undesirable effects, as well as perceived benefits, but this is only anecdotal.4
There also is concern about the consistency and labeling accuracy of medical cannabis products. Some states that allow medical marijuana use in humans have standards for labeling and quality control testing. However, there is evidence that cannabis products frequently are inconsistent in composition and labeling despite these regulations.5-6 Given the complete absence of regulation or testing for veterinary cannabis-derived remedies, it is impossible to evaluate the consistency or labeling of these products, but they are likely to be at least as unreliable as products intended for human use.
Interpreting other data
In the absence of clinical research in veterinary patients, we must look to human medical research literature despite the obvious dangers of extrapolating across species. A recent comprehensive literature review, produced by the National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine, evaluates the risks and benefits of cannabis-based therapies that have been studied and classifies them using a straightforward system.7 The strength of evidence is rated as insufficient to draw a conclusion—limited, moderate, substantial or conclusive.
Many of these risks and benefits evaluated do not apply to veterinary patients, including risks that our patients will not face (such as the danger of impaired driving) and diseases they do not experience (such as atherosclerotic coronary artery disease).
Here are the conclusions of the review for conditions that might be relevant to our patients:
Benefits: In adults with chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting, oral cannabinoids are effective anti-emetics. In adults with chronic pain, patients who were treated with cannabis or cannabinoids are more likely to experience a clinically significant reduction in pain symptoms. For these conditions, the effects of cannabinoids are modest; for all other conditions evaluated, there is inadequate information to assess their effects.
Risks: Cannabis use has been associated with increased risk of schizophrenia and other psychoses, and with some anxiety disorders in a dose-dependent relationship.
Cannabis has many active chemical compounds, and it’s likely some will have beneficial therapeutic effects. There is substantial evidence for only a couple of uses in humans, including pain and chemotherapy-induced nausea. There is no direct evidence for any use of cannabis in dogs and cats, though there is clear evidence for the toxicity of marijuana. All veterinary cannabis products are unregulated, and most have not been tested for safety or quality control, much less clinical benefits. Until further research is available, use of cannabis in dogs and cats is entirely experimental and based only on anecdote, and it is most likely illegal for veterinarians to provide or recommend any of these products.
Dr. McKenzie holds a master’s degree in physiology and animal behavior from the University of California, Santa Cruz. After attending the University of Pennsylvania School of Veterinary Medicine and began working as a small animal general practice veterinarian, he discovered evidence-based veterinary medicine. He has served as president of the Evidence-Based Veterinary Medicine Association and reaches out to the public through his SkeptVet blog, his contributions to the Science-Based Medicine blog and media interviews on veterinary medical topics. He earned his MSc in epidemiology at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, and is certified in medical acupuncture for veterinarians.
1. Janczyk P, Donaldson CW, Gwaltney S. “Two hundred and thirteen cases of marijuana toxicosis in dogs.” Vet and Human Toxicol. 2004; 46(1):19-21.
2. Donaldson C. “Marijuana exposure in animals.” Vet Med. 2002; 97(6):437-439.
3. Meola SD, Tearney CC, Haas SA, et al. “Evaluation of trends in marijuana toxicosis in dogs living in a state with legalized medical marijuana: 125 dogs (2005-2010).” J Vet Emerg Crit Care (San Antonio). 2012 Dec; 22(6):690-6.
4. Kogan LR, Hellyer PW, Robinson NG, et al. “Consumer perceptions of hemp products for animals.” J Amer Holistic Vet Med Assoc. 2016; 42:40-48.
5. Vandrey R, Raber JC, Raber ME, et al. “Cannabinoid dose and label accuracy in edible medical cannabis products.” JAMA. 2015; 313:2491–2493.
6. Thomas BF, Pollard GT. “Preparation and Distribution of Cannabis and Cannabis-Derived Dosage Formulations for Investigational and Therapeutic Use in the United States.” Frontiers in Pharmacol. 2016; 7:285.
7. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2017. “The health effects of cannabis and cannabinoids: The current state of evidence and recommendations for research.” The National Academies Press. Accessed on April 30, 2017, at bit.ly/2jCIHU9.