VPN Logo   
 Home   About Us   Contact Us
7:45 PM   February 03, 2012
Your E-mail:
Do you have an e-reader?

 

 
Bookmark and Share
California Won't Tax Vet Services

Posted: Thursday, February 19, 2009, 2:05 p.m., EST

California State CapitolThe California Legislature passed a 17-month budget on Feb. 19 that does not include a sales tax on veterinary services.

Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger had proposed taxing veterinary services as well as auto, appliance and furniture repairs, golf fees and amusement parks as one way to help fix the state’s $11.2 billion budget shortfall.

The budget plan passed on Feb. 19 still requires the governor's signature.

The California Veterinary Medical Assn. launched a statewide campaign in November and asked its more than 6,000 member veterinarians to write to the governor to explain the hardships the tax could impose on pet owners and crowded pet shelters.

William Grant II, DVM, president of the CVMA, called the tax discriminatory because it singled out only one healing arts profession.

On Feb. 19, the CVMA issued a joint press release with The Humane Society of the United States thanking the governor for responding to the public’s opposition to the veterinary tax.

“Requiring pet owners to pay a tax to care for their animals is bad public policy,” Dr. Grant said. “We are pleased members of the ‘Big Five,’ including the governor, recognized that and the proposed tax was removed from the final budget bill.

“The opposition of veterinarians, pet owners and concerned citizens was so intense, a special extension was added to the governor’s budget voicemail line to handle the opposition to the tax on pets,” Grant said. “We believe the overwhelming number of calls delivered an emphatic message to the governor that taxing pet owners would be hugely unpopular and inequitable.”

The proposal to extend the sales tax to veterinary services could have added up to 10 percent to the cost of caring for animals in California, according to the state Legislative Analyst’s Office. The CVMA maintained that this would have endangered the health and well-being of animals kept as pets, raised on farms or sheltered by humane agencies.

The CVMA said it monitored a commission appointed by the governor to restructure and modernize California’s tax system and watch for any tax proposals affecting veterinary medicine.

“We know the fight to protect animal care from taxation is not over,” Grant said. “Our membership remains firmly opposed to taxes that will force our clients to make untenable decisions affecting the quality of life for their pets and that might put our food supply at risk. It was wrong last week and it will be wrong next year.” <HOME>

 Give us your opinion on
California Won't Tax Vet Services

Submit a Comment

Industry Professional Site: Comments from non-industry professionals will be removed.

Reader Comments
when did this finally pass? how did it get by us so slyly? new puppies, older dogs and cancer/chronically ill pets will suffer the most as will their families
Leanne, Irvine, CA
Posted: 10/5/2009 3:38:22 PM
Thank you for your support in fighting this horrific proposal. I am and will always believe that it is not in the best interest of pets to financially overburden their owners. Please keep me informed of any future unfavorable tax plans.
Debby Hoeltgen, San Diego, CA
Posted: 4/13/2009 2:20:08 PM
As a volunteer in dog rescue, I know firsthand how difficult it is for average people to afford a family dog. Even without a tax on veterinary services, many dogs are not receiving basic care such as regular exams and tests to catch health problems early enough to successfully treat them. With such a tax, multitudes of people would feel they could not afford keeping a pet, and many current owners would probably relinquish their pets to a shelter. Ultimately, these wonderful, beautiful animals are euthanized because there are not enough homes where people can afford a pet. Also, many people take on the role of pet owner/guardian and relinquish the pet after realizing the animal has basic requirements such as training, exercise, regular feeding times, and routine veterinary exams. If the animal should develop a medical problem, the uninformed, inexperienced owner/guardian is overwhelmed and the animal suffers neglect and/or worse. Give us a break! Why not put an extra tax on such items as candy, children's toys, human medical care, and all sports equipment?
Margaret, San Diego, CA
Posted: 2/20/2009 2:56:36 PM
View Current Comments

BROUGHT TO YOU BY Veterinary Practice News

Copyright ©   BowTie, Inc. All rights reserved.
Our Privacy Policy has changed.
Privacy Policy/Your Cailfornia Privacy Rights.
Terms of Use | Guidelines for Participation

Vet Grooming Video
Featured Vet Grooming Video 
Video Button
Facebook