Subscribe to VETERINARY PRACTICE NEWS   SUBSCRIBER SERVICES    Bookmark and Share
VPN Logo   
 Home   About Us   Contact Us
10:35 PM   May 25, 2013
Your E-mail:
 

 
Bookmark and Share
Iverhart Max Lot Recalled on Efficacy Concern

Posted: April 13, 2012, 3:45 p.m. EDT

Virbac Animal Health voluntarily recalled one lot of its canine heartworm and internal parasite preventive Iverhart Max Chewable Tablets (ivermectin, pyrantel pamoate, praziquantel) because the ivermectin failed to meet the company’s stability specifications.

Some dogs dosed with tablets from the affected lot (#110482 for large dogs, 50.1 to 100 lbs.) may not be protected against heartworm disease, the company said.

heartworm
Virbac is recalling one lot of its canine heartworm preventative Iverhart Max Chewable Tablets.
The lot number is stamped on the side lid or flap of the product’s box in a white text field and on the blister foil of the individual doses.

Virbac, of Fort Worth, Texas, sent letters to veterinary distributors instructing them to cease distribution of the affected lot and to advise veterinary clinics in receipt of the recalled product to cease dispensing it.

The other active ingredients in Iverhart were not affected, the company said, meaning the tablets should provide protection against other internal parasites. Virbac tested other lots of Iverhart and confirmed only one lot was affected.

No heartworm-related adverse events or illnesses had been reported to Virbac as of late March. If veterinarians see a potentially affected dog, they should contact Virbac Technical Services at 1-800-338-3659 x3052) to discuss testing procedures. If a dog taking the product is infected with heartworms, its treatment will be covered under the Iverhart product satisfaction guarantee, the company said.

 

<HOME>

 Give us your opinion on
Iverhart Max Lot Recalled on Efficacy Concern

Submit a Comment

Industry Professional Site: Comments from non-industry professionals will be removed.

Reader Comments
Shouldnt we contact clients to ensure that they get blood tests? I am concerned that a reactive approach is not the right one? Anyone else have a concern?
Sandra, Phoenix, AZ
Posted: 4/30/2013 11:39:57 AM
It was a wise move. I just hope Virbac made a sincere effort to test and not a random, minimal one. Their recall is commendable.
Melinda, Virginia Beach, VA
Posted: 4/28/2012 7:16:17 AM
Hi Brittany,

The information in this story came directly from Virbac in a press release dated March 26, 2012.

Thank you,
Stephanie Brown
VeterinaryPracticeNews.com Web Editor
Stephanie, Irvine, CA
Posted: 4/18/2012 9:52:05 AM
Is this information accurate? I checked Iverharts website and the FDA and they don't have any of this information. They have a recall from 2009 but not this year.
Brittany, Cincinnati, OH
Posted: 4/17/2012 1:21:19 PM
View Current Comments

BROUGHT TO YOU BY Veterinary Practice News

Copyright ©  I-5 Publishing, LLC. All rights reserved.
Our Privacy Policy has changed.
PRIVACY POLICY/YOUR CALIFORNIA PRIVACY RIGHTS.
Terms of Use | Guidelines for Participation

Gold Standard

*Content generated by our loyal visitors, which includes comments and club postings, is free of constraints from our editors' red pens, and therefore not governed by I-5 Publishing, LLC's Gold Standard Quality Content, but instead allowed to follow the free form expression necessary for quick, inspired and spontaneous communication.

Click here to subscribe

Subscriber Services

See all veterinary videos
Featured Vet Grooming Video 
Video Button
Facebook