Lysine for FHV? Researchers Say Don’t Bother

A systematic review of studies finds little to no evidence of lysine’s value in feline herpesvirus cases.

Sebastiaan Bol is a laboratory assistant in the department of botany and plant sciences at the University of California, Riverside.

Sebastiaan Bol

Suggested Veterinary Products

Originally published in the January 2016 issue of Veterinary Practice News.

Two virologists are urging veterinarians to immediately stop lysine supplementation in cats suffering from feline herpesvirus-1 because they say the therapy is ineffective.

Their conclusion, published Nov. 16 in the online journal BMC Veterinary Research, drew a measured response from two experts in the field who said anecdotal reports of successful lysine use leave open the possibility that the therapy does work.

Husband-and-wife virologists Sebastiaan Bol, MS, Ph.D., and Evelien M. Bunnik, MS, Ph.D., reached the conclusion after conducting a systematic review—essentially a study of previous lysine studies.

Bol, who like his wife is employed at the University of California, Riverside, began the review after their 8-year-old cat, Aguereberry, was diagnosed with FHV-1, a highly contagious infection of the upper respiratory system. Their veterinarian recommended lysine nutritional supplements to treat and manage the disease.

“With my background in biology and nutrition, I was very suspicious, and I started clicking—doing some searches online—and I was not very convinced,” Bol said. “So I started looking into more and more of the publications, and it was really shocking to see that there’s absolutely no evidence [that lysine is effective in cats].”

Bol and Bunnik’s research article looked at seven studies of lysine and FHV-1—two in vitro studies and five involving cats—as well as 10 studies of human herpesvirus-1. Examining papers dating to the 1970s, Bol found that the lysine recommendation originated with a human study.

The veterinary studies offered no scientific proof of lysine’s efficacy in cats, he said. Those papers, he discovered, all stopped short of advocating an end to lysine supplementation in FHV-1 cases.

What Bol didn’t know at first was how often veterinarians prescribed lysine to FHV-1 cats. Did Aguereberry’s doctor follow the crowd or was she an exception?

“So I did a survey and found that over 90 percent of the veterinarians are recommending it,” Bol said.

You May Also Like  Megacolon can be curable when handled the right way

He asked 68 cat hospitals spread across the United States, Australia and the United Kingdom whether they prescribed lysine. Of the 23 hospitals that replied, 21 of them, or 91 percent, did.

FHV researcher David Maggs, BVSc, Dipl. ACVO, a professor of veterinary ophthalmology at the University of California, Davis, School of Veterinary Medicine, complimented Bol for that additional research and for Bol and Bunnik’s overall work.

“The authors have done a tremendous review of the literature,” Dr. Maggs said. “It seems to be very comprehensive, very complete. They turned up one or two articles that I wasn’t aware of, and then they certainly turned up all the articles that I am aware of.”

Five of the seven veterinary studies were co-authored by Maggs. But none of Maggs’ studies reached the same conclusion as Bol’s: a recommended “immediate stop of lysine supplementation because of the complete lack of any scientific evidence for its efficacy.”

“I was surprised by the conclusion,” Maggs said. “The conclusion seems to be, at least for science, very boldly stated. Scientists are well known for not really stating things very boldly, and that’s one of the criticisms we get.

“To say that there was no evidence strikes me as a little bit odd because they point out in their own manuscript that there has been at least one study that suggested a benefit.”

Bol responded that of the clinical feline studies he examined, “maybe one study” found something, “but that was only after they very narrowly looked at one specific thing.”

He also noted that the clinical studies had small sample sizes and that one study showing some effectiveness “only compared four cats to four other cats.”

Anecdotal evidence should not be discarded, Maggs said.

“I have clients who tell me that every time they take the cat off lysine the problem returns,” he said. “Now that’s totally anecdotal evidence, but … I’m using it as an example that we should not recommend a blanket immediate cessation of therapy in all cats.

You May Also Like  Why wellness plans are great for your vet practice

“There are clearly some cats who respond well in a disease that sometimes has very subtle signs,” he added. “Maybe it’s just as well to leave those cats on lysine if the clients genuinely feel that it’s making a difference.”

Maggs’ comment was supported by Texas feline practitioner Gary D. Norsworthy, DVM, Dipl. ABVP, who co-edited “The Feline Patient, 4th Edition.”

“[Lysine] is used frequently by many of my clients at the recommendation of Dr. Google,” Dr. Norsworthy said. “Some cats have a very convincing response in spite of what the science says.

“I do not recommend it as a first-line treatment for feline herpesvirus-1,” he said, “but I also do not discourage it. Cats are not very conversant with the literature. Its use should be based on response, whether scientific or not.”

The textbook “The Feline Patient” acknowledges some uncertainty about lysine. One part states:

“For several years, lysine (250-500 mg/cat q12h PO) has been thought to have activity against the acute and chronic phases of FHV-1 infection. However, two recent studies failed to demonstrate efficacy of lysine against upper respiratory infections in groups of shelter cats. In one of these studies, lysine therapy was associated with worsening of clinical signs and increased detection of FHV-1 viral DNA in oropharyngeal and conjunctiva mucosal samples. As such, use of lysine for treating FVH-1 must be reconsidered.”

Bol suggested that practitioners swayed by anecdotal evidence should consider another possible reason for improvements in FHV cats: the passage of time.

“When people bring their cats to the clinic … the symptoms are pretty severe and [veterinarians] prescribe the lysine,” Bol said. “Over time, with or without treatment, symptoms will improve. When you give the cat lysine, symptoms will improve. Is it because of the lysine?

“They have absolutely no way to say that it is because of the lysine,” he added. “They have no way to say that the same improvement would occur if they would not have treated the cat with lysine. That’s why you need a control group [in studies]. Anecdotal evidence is no evidence. … Anecdotal evidence is a contradiction in terms.”

You May Also Like  Florida’s North American Veterinary Heart Center holds grand opening

Bol and Bunnik’s paper, available at, noted that scientists believe lysine does not possess antiviral properties. Rather, some researchers propose that lysine works by lowering arginine levels.

And therein lies another issue, Bol stated.

“Lowering arginine levels is highly undesirable since cats cannot synthesize this amino acid themselves,” he and Bunnik wrote. “Arginine deficiency will result in hyperammonemia, which may be fatal.”

Having studied FHV himself and after reading the virologists’ systematic review, Maggs remained wary.

“[I] recommend perhaps a moderation of the final conclusion because I don’t think we can say that this drug should be stopped in all cats with herpesvirus,” Maggs said. “I think they’ve introduced a useful cautionary note of whether it should be initiated in every cat, but recommending an immediate cessation is probably a stronger conclusion that I would have drawn from the same data.”

Going by the Book

An industry authority, The Merck Veterinary Manual, has backed away from endorsing lysine therapy in feline herpesvirus cases. The most recent print edition, published in 2010, suggested lysine’s use.

The online version has since been updated to read: “Previously, lifelong oral L-lysine (250-500 mg/day) was recommended to help prevent or reduce the severity of recurrent feline herpesvirus infections. However, recent work has shown that oral L-lysine can actually exacerbate feline herpesvirus infections.”

The 11th edition of the manual, due out in February, will reflect the change, an editor told virologist Sebastiaan Bol in an email. 

10 thoughts on “Lysine for FHV? Researchers Say Don’t Bother

  1. If studies cannot confirm L-Lysine’s effect, maybe the underlying cause for the annecdotal evidence as you call it is based on a misdiagnosis of FHV-1?
    We cannot take our Persian cat off of her lysine additive without her developing symptoms within days (incredibly teary eyes, stuffy nose and sneezing). Then again I, personally, have no way of telling if what she had is actually FHV-1.

    1. Indeed our cat does NOT have herpes, at least not according to expensive tests that we got done. It does however have a chronic upper respiratory infection and allergies, which seems to be helped by Lysine. Perhaps you are right.

  2. I have been giving my cat lysine chews for year. If I get lazy and start skipping days, his eye discharge and sneezing will start right back up. This has happened too many times over the years for this to be a coincidence. I don’t care about the new research. My personal “research” says that lysine definitely helps keep the herpes virus suppressed in my cat.

  3. Let me get this straight, they didn’t actually conduct any studies of their own, correct?
    If they had actually conducted some extensive studies of the effects of L-Lysine in cats diagnosed with FHV, then I might be a little more inclined to believe that it has no benefit.

  4. i have been
    diagnosed with Hepatitis B for 2years
    and i lived in pain with the knowledge
    that i wasn’t going to ever be well
    again i contacted so many herbal
    doctors on this issue and wasted a large
    sum of money but my condition never
    got better i was determined to get my
    life back so one day i saw Mr shokki post
    on how Dr Aikhomu saved him from the
    VIRUS with herbal medicine i contacted
    Dr Aikhomu on we spoke
    on the issue i told him all that i went
    through and he told me not to worry
    that everything will be fine again so he
    prepared the medicine and send it to
    me through courier service and told me
    how to use it,after 7days of usage I
    went to see the doctor for test ,then the
    result was negative,am the happiest
    man on earth now ,,contact Dr Aikhomu you
    can also call him or whatsapp him on
    +2348100962873. today
    and get your cure. or email him ( draikhomuherbalhome@gmail. com)

  5. I’m here to testify about what DR. IYOHA did for me. I have been suffering from (GENITAL HERPES VIRUS) disease for the past 6 years and had constant pain and inching, especially in my private part. During the first year, I had faith in God that i would be cured someday.This disease started circulating all over my body and I have been taking treatment from my doctor, I came across a testimony of Gordon Anthony on the internet testifying about a Man called DR. IYOHA on how he cured him from 10 years HSV 2. And she also gave the email address of this man, advise anybody to contact him for help on any kind of diseases that he would be of help, so I emailed him telling him about my (HSV 2) he told me not to worry that I was going to be cured!! Well, I never doubted him I have faith he can cure me too,, DR. IYOHA prepared and sent me Healing Oil, Soap, roots and herbs which I took. In the first week, I started experiencing changes all over me, after two weeks of using his Roots/ Herbs, Oil and Soap, I was totally cured. no more inching , pain on me anymore as DR. IYOHA assured me. After some time I went to my doctor to do another test behold the result came out negative. So friends my advise is if you have such disease or know anyone who suffers from it or any other disease like HPV, HBV, HIV, ALS, HBP, CANCER etc. you can contact DR. IYOHA for help via email} or call +1(407) 337-9869 .Thanks once again DR. IYOHA for making me a happy woman again

  6. It is interesting that most of the posts in response to Sebastiaan Bol’s review cite personal anecdotal evidence for the usage of L-lysine to treat ailments including FHV-1. I think the statement “a contradiction in terms” is key. The article is warning against weighing heavily the perceived “evidence” against controlled studies and they, quite frankly, fall short.

Leave a Comment


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *